Suburbia offered
middle class families a chance to own a house which was not possible in the
18th century. Many of the European families who immigrated to the United States
remained cultural connected to their European heritages. The dream for an
individual to privately own a home remained very important. In Europe, many
owned homes remained owned under the same family for years and often times many
centuries. Thus many people were subjected to living in the cities in
small-sized apartments, with little or no space to relax in away from the urban
environment. Levitt standardized housing emerged in the east coast and served
as a “socialist” housing which created custom-made, standardized, affordable
housing for middle class citizens. The houses were easily constructed and made
relatively quickly and much importantly were spacious and wide enough for a
nuclear-family to reside in. Within the houses, there were planned floor plans,
kitchen design and a convenient dishwasher and dryer provided. More
importantly, there were open spaces such as green lawns that were available
with the houses.
These green lawns
offered large open spaces (privately owned) which was influenced by the
European Romantic Movement in the early 19th century, emphasizing the outdoors.
The lawn offered families a barrier from their daily hectic work lives and
interactions with the gesellscaft, which “separated the household from threats
and temptations of the city” (58). Hence, the availability to retreat to a
relaxed private home life appealed to many Americans after the War. And
consequently, the purchase of homes and consumerism created an upsurge in
support of American technological innovations purchased and used in the homes.
Columina reveals
in her book that the technological innovations, architecture, and organization
and work management found within the smaller infrastructures of society reveal
the changes world system shifting towards capitalism and the US as a favorable
model of modernism. She shows that there is a redefinition of the architect and
architectural design by the war effort and the recycling of military
technocrats, materials and attitudes to the reorganization of post war space
and lifestyle.
World War II
brought new innovations in modern warfare, which included the use of logistics,
gathering of information for intelligence on the battlefields, and the
management of large scale scientific projects. In order to maintain the United
State’s status as one of the World Power ( in opposition to USSR), the U.S.
military relied on the growth of industry and academia, to further create new
innovations and further boost the American economy and population. As a result,
the U.S. army applied their innovations and the skills of their personnel in a
smaller, domestic scale, which benefited the economic system of capitalism and
liberalism.
Psychologists who
were employed in the war used the aptitude tests used on army recruits in the
American schools to test the intelligence. This brought organizational theory
to raising, training and preparing students to enter the workforce, and further
created a rapid rationalization of selection and advancement of individuals
into their occupations. During the wartime period, the organization of the army
played a pivotal role in organizing the post-war office environment and space
within the domestic sphere. As a result, this creates and a developed work
ethnic to complete duties and tasks more efficiently.
The Cockpit
created the body to become mechanized and systemized. The use of simulations
prepared army personnel or showed the army whether the individual was adept to
conduct and fly an airplane. After the war, the cockpit simulations were used
to boost the American aviation sector, when commercial aviation was used to
bring passengers and tourists to their desired destinations. Consequently, in
the following decades, airline deregulation in the US market and the European
markets occurred, creating a decrease in prices and a leveling of commercial
airline prices, as they fairly competed against one another in the free market.
All-in-all, we see
that consumerism in the domestic market through buying homes and domestic
products support the liberalism, capitalistic system. However, the system
itself instills modes of efficiency through applying its military innovations
towards the larger scale of society, through logistics through aptitude
testing, management of work, and technologies to aid domestic work.
Consequently, the economic system is engrained within society itself and acts
as a mobilizing agent in affecting the architectural designs of society itself,
as now architect serves as a “socialist” agent providing sustenance and
conscious safety to the nation as a whole.
No comments:
Post a Comment